This month, Liam looks at the likely key drivers of investor sentiment in the first half of the year, the Q1 earnings season and the path of interest rates, and discusses a new stock on our radar, TSMC. Locally, Mandy and the team flash through locally listed retail and property, concluding with a piece on what has driven Naspers and Prosus lower in 2022.
Enjoy the read.
International Section
By the numbers | Q1 earnings season | Interest rate hikes | Investing for the future
Local Section
By the numbers | Cyclical sector valuations – Retail and Property | Prosus and Naspers
International section
By the Numbers
Not entirely surprising to see companies with commodity exposure featuring on the upside of the equation, as numerous commodities spiked as a result of the Russian/Ukraine war. JD.com, one of the Chinese tech companies we mentioned earlier, languished at the bottom of the table as the Nasdaq’s worst performer for the month after dropping 19%. Interesting to see Tesla jumping more than 20% in March. Musk is clearly of the view that if something has worked well, why not simply do it again. A second stock split on the cards was just what the retail punter needed to help drive Musk’s wealth to spectacular levels. I don’t know why I didn’t think of that. I mean, it’s all about how many shares I have, right? Two is greater than one – it’s simple maths. You know that old saying… ‘Fool me once, shame on you, fool my twice, shame on me!’
Q1 earnings season promises to be enlightening
For most of 2021, equity market performance was driven by earnings growth as PE multiples contracted from record-high levels. Earnings growth was sufficient to deliver a >30% performance in the S&P 500 in 2021, as year-end earnings growth finished up 48%. With earnings growth expectations for 2022 being questioned, we have seen an impact on the market’s performance.
1st quarter earnings growth and forward guidance will be critical in shaping the performance dynamics as we move forward. Currently, expectations are for Q1 earnings growth to be in the region of 4.7% – down from 5.7% as of 31 December – as we are seeing more companies provide negative guidance moving closer to reporting season.
For the remainder of 2022, expectations are for earnings to be in the region of $227.80, representing growth of 9.3%. If the typical 5% earnings beat materialises, that will mean a more typical 15% earnings growth rate. The S&P 500 is currently trading at a slightly above-average multiple of 19x; given rising interest rates and more normal earnings growth expectations, it’s hard to make a case for multiple expansion. It is a stock pickers market, which should divide up the winners and losers. We will focus on companies with strong pricing power and superior growth dynamics.
The interest rate hiking cycle has begun
Unfortunately, transitionary inflation seems more longer-term in nature as prices of all categories have ramped up along with wages.
The Fed narrative has become more hawkish as they try to play catch-up and get inflation under control without damaging economic growth. The Fed raised rates for the first time at their March meeting, taking the effective Fed Fund rate range up to 25-50bps, with the Dot Plot suggesting we will exit the year with rates around 2%. This represents five to six more 25bps rate hikes this year (six more meetings in 2022). The market suggests the Fed needs to be more aggressive and exit the year with rates closer to 2.75%, meaning that the Fed will have to up its game and raise rates 50bps per meeting over the next three meetings to get ahead of the curve.
There is a large amount of scepticism as to whether the Fed has the skill to tighten monetary policy – bringing inflation under control – while at the same time maintaining a healthy economy. Most recessions have resulted from the Fed increasing rates too aggressively and choking off economic growth. The potential for this happening is currently represented by the 10-year/2-year U.S. yield spread, which is close to inverting, suggesting a recession may be imminent.
This tug-of-war is currently dominating the markets, the outcome of which will have a broad impact on risk assets across the globe.
Investing for the future
April 6, 2022
As the new digital world penetrates our traditional way of life, the importance of automation and digitalisation has never been more pertinent. With this in mind, we focus on opportunities that are likely to scale as technologies converge and transform industries, and we believe semiconductors are the building blocks in this theme.
Semiconductors are foundational to the global economy, with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSM) deep-rooted in this industry. TSM is one of the clearest examples of a “Pick-And-Shovel Play”, as it is the underlying technology that makes up the backbone of this growing industry.
TSM is a semiconductor manufacturer that produces the actual end product (semiconductor chip) for other companies such as Nvidia, Apple, and many others, and is referred to as a foundry. It is seen as a more diversified semiconductor player, as its success is not tied to demand growth from a single company; instead, it benefits from a broad semiconductor growth for the industry as a whole.
TSM’s outlook is encouraging: higher revenues and stronger margins should allow TSM to generate compelling earnings quarter over quarter. The company occupies a leading position with >50% share in the foundry market and >80% share in leading processes. Generally, a monopoly in the most cutting-edge technology comes with pricing power.
And that is why, from a growth perspective, TSM is exceptionally well-positioned. TSM, due to being in business with many different companies around the world, will benefit from broad-based chip demand growth in 2022 and beyond. Its success is not tied to individual product lines in the way that other semiconductor players may be. As the ongoing global chip shortage continues, TSM is in a strong negotiating position relative to the companies with whom it trades. Therefore, demanding higher prices shouldn’t be an issue for the company. This explains why the company is forecasting a margin expansion of 53-55% this year – pushing through price increases in a tight market should allow them to offset higher input costs.
TSM has budgeted over $100 billion towards CapEx spend for the next three years. It plans to increase its lead and dominance further by increasing its fab capacity and chip output which should go a long way to increasing growth and returns over the next decade.
In the United States, the Biden administration has authorised the “Facilitating American-Built Semiconductors (FABS) Act”, which could include potentially $52 billion in funding for the U.S. semiconductor industry. This also includes new policies designed to strengthen the U.S. relationship with Taiwan, benefitting TSM and their factory currently being built in Arizona. This aims to provide tax-based incentives for constructing, expanding, or modernising semiconductor fabrication plants to bridge the gap between the U.S. and Asia.
There are concerns that global demand for consumer electronics, like smartphones, PCs and TVs is starting to slow down. However, other sectors, including automotive, High-Performance Computing and Internet-of-Things, are picking up the slack. The TSM chairman has also noted that they cannot meet demand with their current capacity. We expect the demand for chips to remain strong, supporting pricing for decades to come as chips remain a critical component of secular drivers in cloud, AI, 5G and EV adoption.
From a valuation perspective, TSM is attractive. Due to rate hike worries and escalating global tensions, the semiconductor industry has experienced a significant sell-off in recent weeks. TSM shares have declined to just above $100, down 30% from recent highs. This has made TSM’s forward PE multiple drop to around 17.5x. A company with an excellent market position (that is benefiting from strong macro tailwinds and has delivered high-teen growth in recent quarters) seems quite attractive at a high-teens earnings multiple, especially as its relative growth looks more attractive in a slowing growth environment.
Across the industry, there has been a substantial uptick in the overall PE multiples. This should continue for the next five years due to the emergence of 5G technology, widespread adoption of electric vehicles, Internet-of-Things (IoT), and Data Centers.
International Section
By the numbers | Q1 earnings season | Interest rate hikes | Investing for the future
Local Section
By the numbers | Cyclical sector valuations – Retail and Property | Prosus and Naspers
Local section
By the Numbers
The Foschini Group, a stock that we recently added to our portfolios, led the sector higher in March with an 18% return. While not included in our indices, it’s important to take note of the ZAR this year. It moved from around R16 to the dollar down to R14.50 – a remarkable story indeed. Not only this, but for the first time in many years, we have seen foreigners as net buyers of South African equities. Long may it last!
Cyclical sector valuations – Retail & Property
Retail Sector
The South African economy has been showing signs of a post-pandemic recovery. However, this is threatened by ongoing supply chain issues, the Ukraine crisis, stubbornly high unemployment, rising fuel costs, increasing inflation, and interest rate hikes, to name but a few. Despite these challenges, management teams of SA retail companies have done a great job in driving sales growth, improving margins, and managing cost inflation. Highlights from recent results updates include the following:
- Companies recorded strong sales growth in the last quarter of 2021, driven by Black Friday promotions and festive shopping. This momentum carried through into the new year, with January sales supported by strong back-to-school promotions. The growth in sales varied across the retailers, with The Foschini Group (TFG) and Mr Price (MRP) capturing the highest growth amongst clothing retailers, with Shoprite (SHP) the highest in the food category. Massmart struggled, with sales down over 6%.
- Inflation remains a focal point for the global market, and pricing was key for the retailers. Management teams successfully walked a tight rope of passing inflation to consumers while at the same time managing volumes, evidenced by margin expansions. Internal price inflation was well-managed across the food and clothing retailers. Shoprite’s price inflation remained relatively low and is targeted to be 3.9% for FY22. On a group level, Woolworths (WHL) also managed to keep price inflation low at 3.7%, while on the other hand, Truworths (TRU) chose to keep pricing attractive, noting a 2% price deflation for the 1H22.
- We also saw improved operating margins from various cost management initiatives, including declining rental expenses, as management continued to negotiate a reduction in leases.
- Balance sheet positions continue to strengthen, with improved net debt levels and strong free cash flow generation. Free cash flow was returned to shareholders in the form of dividends and share buybacks. Companies continued to take advantage of the low share prices, with TRU buying back 14.5m shares (representing 3.8% of shares outstanding) at an average price of R53.26 per share. Similarly, Shoprite reported having repurchased R339m worth of shares in the 1H22 financial year.
- We continued to see the quality of the credit books of credit retailers improve. The TRU credit book continues to be in a healthy state, with all key metrics indicating it is well-positioned to support sales growth. TRU management reported increased application levels, declining overdue accounts and net bad debt levels, and a reduced doubtful debt allowance. Similarly, TFG reported normalised average approval rates and an increase in the credit book. However, both retailers noted that overall credit remained purposely restricted by stringent acceptance criteria in line with prevailing economic conditions. We expect to see growth in the credit books with improving conditions as management starts to relax the credit risk criteria.
We continue to believe that valuations are not fully reflecting the improved operating environment in SA.
Recent updates from property companies highlighted a somewhat improving but challenging operating environment, with the following key themes noted:
- Retail portfolios continue to improve, driven by lower vacancies, improving trading densities, increased footfall, increased leasing activities from national retailers and improved rental collections. Most companies noted that they had seen increased basket sizes as turnovers have recovered faster than foot count, which is still below pre-Covid levels. This is evidenced in the chart below from the Vukile FY22 pre-close presentation.
- Industrial portfolios remain defensive as vacancies continued to trend lower. This is driven by a relatively strong demand for industrial properties, evidenced by the improved renewal success rates and increased letting activities.
- However, weakness was noted in the office portfolios as vacancies remained high, driven by weak renewal success rates resulting from tenant downsizing (to reduce costs) coupled with an oversupply in the sector.
- Balance sheets are stronger as companies continue to pay down debt resulting in more sustainable capital structures with loan-to-value ratios trending downward.
- Property companies continue to dispose of non-core assets. On average, non-core assets were disposed of at or above book value. Management teams were successful in driving disposals in a challenging operating environment.
Property shares continue to trade at significant discounts to net asset value despite the relatively improved conditions. We continue to believe the property sector is mispriced and offers outsized returns.
Overall, valuations remain subdued and do not accurately reflect the improved operating environment. We remain optimistic about this cyclical sector.
Prosus and Naspers – A challenging start to 2022
Tencent – Regulations Drag on Earnings
Over the last year, a barrage of Chinese regulations was introduced, including anti-trust laws, data regulations, limits on game time for minors, and months-long game licensing halts. This impacted almost every internet sphere including eCommerce, online gaming, and education. Tencent co-founder, Pony Ma, and President, Martin Lau, supported the move to a more controlled internet environment where, in their opinion, more regulation would lead to healthier, sustainable growth over the long term.
Over the short term, however, the regulatory impact and a slowing Chinese economy has dampened earnings, with Tencent posting its lowest revenue growth on record (+8%) along with a 25% decline in earnings. Domestic gaming revenue saw a soft 1% increase in Q4, down from the 5% increase in Q3, and signs of stress started to show in online advertising, which posted a 13% decline in ad revenue for Q4.
The impact on earnings was not specific to Tencent, with similar earnings pressure being felt by their biggest rival, Alibaba, as they too battled with the regulatory onslaught and a slowing economic environment.
The large discount between underlying net asset value (NAV) and market valuation has become an infamous trait of Naspers and Prosus. Breaking this discount down into the sum of the parts identifies how significant this discount has become and begs the question of whether it is warranted. Prosus, as of 31 March 2022, was trading at an NAV of R1,800 per share. This is calculated using live pricing for its listed assets and December valuations (provided by Prosus) for the unlisted assets. To be prudent and account for any significant value changes, if the value of the unlisted assets is halved, the underlying NAV adjusts down to R1,600 per share. Lastly, if unlisted assets are left out entirely, the underlying NAV sits at R1,400 per share for the listed assets.
Tencent leading the pack
Tencent makes up around 80% of the underlying NAV of Prosus. Comparing price performance, Prosus (and Naspers) track Tencent to a large degree. In the past few months, the negative days have hit NPN and PRX harder, leading to a widening gap in the discount being priced in.
While recent performance has been tricky, on a positive note the second half of 2022 is anticipated to bring some life back into Tencent. The crackdown on the technology sector is largely over, and while Tencent does anticipate new regulations to be imposed over time, they are expected to be incrementally far less onerous than the regulations imposed over the past few years.
The Chinese economic environment is the next factor determining earnings expectations. With Chinese Vice Premier Liu He confirming Beijing would roll out support for the economy and keep markets stable, Tencent stands to benefit. The news of more accommodative policies was well received by the market and is anticipated to feed into results later this year.
Tencent has historically traded on an average forward PE of around 30x. At its low point in March, this valuation dropped close to 15x, recovering to around 21.6x at current pricing. Excluding their associates (other investments), which focus primarily on Tencent’s core operating numbers, this forward PE drops to around 16.7x at current pricing. From our perspective, these levels price attractively, verging on cheap, despite expectations for more subdued growth levels.
Tencent is not without its challenges, but earnings potential remains, albeit at a slower rate than seen in the past. With an improving operating environment and the market currently pricing in a worst-case scenario, we believe Tencent stands to benefit. With Tencent as a driver in the second half of 2022 and based on its depressed price point and the margin of safety the discount to underlying NAV creates, we feel comfortable adding to our Prosus exposure (where appropriate).
Closing Comments
But, as we have said consistently, there are always likely to be opportunities that present themselves during times of volatility, with the latest examples highlighted in this newsletter being cases in point. Benjamin Graham (the father of value investing) is quoted as saying that the market is like a voting machine in the short term, tallying up which stocks are popular, and which are not. But in the long term, it is like a weighing machine assessing the substance of a company. While not as eloquently put, our investment process and philosophy follow a similar thought process. We attempt to assess the extent to which short-term news flow is shaping current share prices, particularly where we believe current commentary is irrelevant to the long-term earnings outcome of the company under consideration. Where the team believes the disconnects are too significant, either a buy or sell decision is triggered. As the war rages on and investors become increasingly hawkish on monetary policy, we believe further opportunities will present themselves for the prudent allocation of capital.